In a bold move that’s shaking up the academic world, the Trump administration has revoked Harvard University’s ability to enroll international students. This decision, announced on May 22, 2025, by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), affects thousands of students and has sparked widespread debate.

The administration cites concerns over campus safety, alleged antisemitism, and ties to foreign entities as reasons for this action. Harvard, however, argues that this move is unlawful and retaliatory. A federal judge has since issued an injunction, temporarily blocking the administration’s efforts to revoke the legal status of affected students.
Trump Targets Harvard Again
Topic | Details |
---|---|
Action Taken | DHS revoked Harvard’s SEVP certification, halting its ability to enroll international students. |
Number of Students Affected | Over 6,700 international students, approximately 27% of Harvard’s enrollment. |
Reasons Cited by DHS | Alleged failure to provide requested records, fostering a hostile environment, and alleged ties to foreign entities. |
Harvard’s Response | Denounced the action as unlawful and retaliatory; filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration. |
Judicial Intervention | U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White issued a nationwide injunction preventing the revocation of international students’ legal status while litigation is ongoing. |
Broader Implications | Potential deterrent effect on international students considering U.S. education; concerns over academic freedom and institutional autonomy. |
The Trump administration’s revocation of Harvard’s ability to enroll international students marks a significant moment in the intersection of education and politics. While the immediate impact is on Harvard and its international students, the broader implications for U.S. higher education institutions are profound. As legal proceedings unfold, the academic community watches closely, understanding that the outcome may set precedents affecting the future of international education in the United States.
Understanding the SEVP Certification
The Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification allows U.S. institutions to enroll international students. Revocation of this certification means the institution can no longer admit new international students, and current students may face challenges in maintaining their visa status.
Impact on International Students
With the revocation of SEVP certification, Harvard’s international students are in a state of uncertainty. While the federal judge’s injunction provides temporary relief, the long-term implications remain unclear. Students may need to consider transferring to other institutions or exploring alternative options to maintain their legal status in the U.S.
Harvard’s Legal Challenge
Harvard has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that the revocation of its SEVP certification is unlawful and retaliatory. The university contends that the action threatens academic freedom and undermines its mission to foster a diverse and inclusive educational environment.
Broader Implications for U.S. Higher Education
This development has raised concerns across the academic community. Institutions fear that such actions could deter international students from choosing U.S. universities, impacting the cultural diversity and financial stability of these institutions. The situation also prompts a broader discussion on the balance between national security and academic freedom.
Is Trump Teaming Up with Crypto Tycoons? What His Private Dinner Reveals
California’s Sky Show: SpaceX Falcon 9 Launch Set to Dazzle Friday Afternoon
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: What does the revocation of SEVP certification mean for Harvard?
A1: It means Harvard cannot enroll new international students, and current international students may face challenges in maintaining their visa status.
Q2: How many students are affected by this decision?
A2: Over 6,700 international students, which is approximately 27% of Harvard’s total enrollment.
Q3: What are the reasons cited by the Trump administration for this action?
A3: The administration cites Harvard’s alleged failure to provide requested records, fostering a hostile environment, and alleged ties to foreign entities.
Q4: Has there been any legal intervention?
A4: Yes, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White issued a nationwide injunction preventing the revocation of international students’ legal status while litigation is ongoing.
Q5: What is Harvard’s response to this action?
A5: Harvard has denounced the action as unlawful and retaliatory and has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration.